Well now we have a label for the new kind of science driving the Climate issue. For the last couple of years I've been scratching my head wondering how scientific people could justify ignoring the scientific method and accept the hypothesis (meaning "un proven") of man made global warming.
Quoting Silvio Funtowicz and Jerry Ravetz, the definition is ... “the application of science to public issues where `facts are uncertain, values in dispute, stakes high and decisions urgent.’”
For more on this click here
Per the author: " Issues that are put into the category of “post-normal science” are no longer subject to the cardinal requirements of true science: skepticism, universalism, communalism, and disinterestedness."
Friday, July 24, 2009
Dr. Roy Spencer explains. Link here. You need to understand that ALL the current furor over Climate is based on these models. To date there has been no actual physical data that supports any of the more dire predictions coming from the modelers. Grab a coffee and comfortable chair and read this. It is well written for the non scientist and has some slick visuals. If nothing else it will provide you with some "smack down" ammunition next time you are around an Alarmist.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
No time for 5 days of testimony? OK, here's a 30 min segment that kinda sums it up. She'lll no doubt be confirmed but watch Lindsy Graham lay down some markers on what's at stake. Well worth your time.